Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:asma [2011/05/03 08:44]
Asma Patel [5. Trends in online video sharing]
+++ articles:asma [2011/05/10 09:53] (current)
Asma Patel [Photos And Videos: New Era in Online Media Sharing]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-===== Photos And Videos =====
+=====Photos And Videos: New Era In Online Media Sharing =====
 ===== 1. Introduction =====
 Online multimedia sharing with the help of advanced technology has changed the way humans used to socialize. Social networking portals are a recent development, allowing a user to create and maintain a network of close friends or business associates for social and/or professional reasons. Media sharing websites such as [[http://youtube.com|You Tube]], [[http://www.flickr.com|flicker]], [[http://www.yahoo.com|yahoo]] etc. have become major social network portal, where people are connected by their common interests on certain types of images or videos and form millions of sub-communities. Apart from that some social sites like [[http://www.facebook.com| Facebook]], [[http://www.myspace.com|MySpace]], [[http://www.orkut.com|Orkut]], etc. are also incorporating photos and videos sharing features, allowing users to very easily upload and share videos as well as photos for their friends and families.
@@ Line 8: / Line 9: @@
 Malinen (2010) in her study finds that in online photo sharing there are two behaviours of photographers ‘Snapr Culture’ and ‘Kodak Culture’, first one referred to people, who takes pictures of traditional subjects such as birth day or any other ceremony and share them with friends or close ones . Whereas other referred to people, who take photographs for sharing them online to any one and their interaction take place through website rather than face to face, they use tagging, commenting and online messaging for maintaining social bounds.
+<html>
+<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lFZ0z5Fm-Ng" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
+</html>
 ===== 2 Features =====
@@ Line 50: / Line 55: @@
 ===== 4. Examples of Popular Media Sharing Web Sites: =====
-There are a variety of social networking websites, including Facebook, Myspace, LinkedIn, Orkut, Ping, and Twitter. These sites facilitate online communication through a variety of media. The interactive, interlinking environment supports the creation of personal and business webpages where information, photos and videos are shared. In February 2010, Google released Google buzz, a service for sharing thoughts, multimedia, and social media website feeds using the existing email service, Gmail. Google buzz is an open environment that adheres to open standards, meaning that developers will be able to create applications for buzz across many platforms. Social bookmarking sites, such as Delicious and Digg, allow people to discover, organize and share content on the web and to access their own favorites from any personal computer.
+There are a variety of social networking websites, including Facebook, Myspace, LinkedIn, Orkut, Ping, and Twitter. These sites facilitate online communication through a variety of media. The interactive, interlinking environment supports the creation of personal and business webpages where information, photos and videos are shared. In February 2010, Google released Google buzz, a service for sharing thoughts, multimedia, and social media website feeds using the existing email service, Gmail. Google buzz is an open environment that adheres to open standards, meaning that developers will be able to create applications for buzz across many platforms. Social bookmarking sites, such as Delicious and Digg, allow people to discover, organize and share content on the web and to access their own favorites from any personal computer. (Cheng et al 2008)
   * [[http://youtube.com|You Tube]] is one of the top destinations online to watch and share videos through the internet. It allows people to easy uploading and sharing of videos through websites, mobile devices, blogs, e-mail, etc. Paolillo (2008) states, since You Tube first launched in December 2005 emerge as major player in video distribution. According to a rough idea this site boasted 100 million views and 65,000 videos upload per day. You Tube also offers community groups which user may join according to their personal interest.
@@ Line 56: / Line 61: @@
 {{ :articles:youtube.jpg| YouTube}}
-<html><center><sup>Figure 3: YouTube Home Page (YouTube 2011) </sup></center></html>
+<html><center><sup> Figure3:YouTube Home Page (YouTube 2011) </sup></center></html>
@@ Line 66: / Line 72: @@
   * [[http://facebook.com|Facebook]] is the largest photo sharing website on the Internet with 14 million photos uploaded daily . Integrating photo sharing within social networking communities has also provided the opportunity for user tagging , annotating, and linking images to the identities of the people in them. (Besmer and Lipford 2009)\\
-  * [[http://orkut.com|Orkut]] a newcomer to the social networking scene, has
+  * [[http://orkut.com|Orkut]] a newcomer to the social networking scene, has attracted a lot of attention because of its links with Google, for whom the site developer works for. Primarily a social site, orkut has a relatively low user base as it requires an invitation to join. Communities are created under thirty or so general category headings (similar to those found at the top level of the Open DirectoryProject) and contain usual message forums and events listings. orkut has been criticized for its poor privacy policy, which has recently been revised.
-attracted a lot of attention because of its links with Google, for whom the site developer works for. Primarily a social site, orkut has a relatively low user base as it requires an invitation to join. Communities are created under thirty or so general category headings (similar to those found at the top level of the Open DirectoryProject) and contain usual message forums and events listings. orkut has been criticized for its poor privacy policy, which has recently been revised.
 (Murchu et al 2004)
@@ Line 74: / Line 79: @@
 ===== 5. Trends in online video sharing =====
+{{ :articles:trend.jpg|trend.jpg}}
+<html>Figure 4: Online video gets social: How users engage (Mashraqi 2008)</html>
 Due to low bandwidth connections (dialup) available in the early internet, image files were the dominant media file format during the 1990s.
  Digital audio for CDs and larger hard drives made audio files an increasingly popular file format during the 1990s. DVD use did not surpass video tape until 2003. Digital cameras and personal computers with optical disk drives became increasing common in the early years of this century. Image sharing websites such as [[http://flicker.com|Flickr]] and video sharing websites such as [[http://youtube.com|YouTube]] allow users to upload and share their pictures and video. Broadband internet, larger hard drives, and faster CPUs in personal computers now allow more individuals to work with digital video files. Websites such as YouTube provide user interfaces that include support for text-based special-interest discussion groups as well as video blogs.
 (Roberts and Foehr 2008)
-{{ :articles:trend.jpg|trend.jpg}}
-<html><center>Figure 4: Online video gets social: How users engage (Mashraqi 2008)</centre></html>
 ===== 6. Legal Implications: =====
@@ Line 105: / Line 109: @@
 ===== References =====
-Besmer,A and Lipford,H.,2009, Privacy Perception of Photo Sharing in Faebook, University of North Carolins at Charlotte. pp. 1-2.
+Besmer,A and Lipford,H.,2009. Privacy Perception of Photo Sharing in Faebook. University of North Carolins at Charlotte. pp. 1-2.
 Boll, Susanne ., 2007. //Multi Tube- Where Multimedia and Web 2.0 could meet//, pp. 9-13.
@@ Line 112: / Line 116: @@
 Cesar, P., Bulterman, C.A., Geerts, D., Jansen, J., Knoche, H and Seager, W., 2008. //Enhancing social sharing of videos: Fragment, Annotate, Enrich and Share//, pp. 11-20.
-Christophe Prieur, Dominique Cardon, Jean-Samuel Beuscart, Nicolas Pissard, Pascal Pons - The Stength of Weak cooperation: A Case Study on Flickr, Feb 2008
+Cheng,X., Dale, C and Liu,J., 2008. Statistics and social networking of YouTube Videos,Canada NSERC Discovery Grant and NSERC Strategic Project grant, IEEE computer society, pp. 229-238.
-Facebook available at <http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics>, [accessed on 23 march 2011]
+Christophe Prieur, Dominique Cardon, Jean-Samuel Beuscart, Nicolas Pissard, Pascal Pons,2008. // The Stength of Weak cooperation: A Case Study on Flickr//, Feb 2008
-Fredcavazza,2008 ,//Social Media Landscape//, Available at <http://www.fredcavazza.net/2008/06/09/social-media-landscape/> [accessed on 26th april 2011]
+Facebook,2011. available at <http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics>, [accessed on 23 march 2011]
-Holt,B. Heidi R.,Lynn and Sowers,M., for www.vidmeter.com - //Analysis of Copyrighted Videos on YouTube.com//, 2007
+Fredcavazza,2008 .//Social Media Landscape//, Available at <http://www.fredcavazza.net/2008/06/09/social-media-landscape/> [accessed on 26th april 2011]
-Kathryn, L., Ossian, M., Paddock,C and Stone,P., - Legal Issues in Social Networking, May 2009
+Holt,B. Heidi R.,Lynn and Sowers,M.,2007. for www.vidmeter.com - //Analysis of Copyrighted Videos on YouTube.com//, 2007
+Kathryn, L., Ossian, M., Paddock,C and Stone,P.,2009. //Legal Issues in Social Networking//, May 2009
+Lenhart,A., 2009. //Adults and social network websites// . PEW INTERNET & AMERICAN LIFE PROJECT. pp. 1-14.
 Malinen, S., 2010. //Photo Exhibition or online Community? The role of social interaction on flicker//, IEEE computer society, pp. 380-385.
-Murchu,I., Breslin,J.G and Decker,S.,2004,//Online Social and Business
+Murchu,I., Breslin,J.G and Decker,S.,2004. //Online Social and Business
-Networking Communities//,DERI Technical Report DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute ,pp. 1-22.
+Networking Communities//.DERI Technical Report DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute ,pp. 1-22.
+Paolillo, J.C.,2008. //Structure and Network in the You Tube Core: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences//, pp.156.
-Paolillo, J.C.,2008, //Structure and Network in the You Tube Core: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences//, pp.156.
+Roberts,D and Foehr ,U., 2008.//Trends in Media Use//, THE FUTURE OF CHILDREN VOL. 18 / NO. 1 / SPRING 2008  pp. 11 -37.
-Roberts,D and Foehr ,U., 2008,//Trends in Media Use//, THE FUTURE OF CHILDREN VOL. 18 / NO. 1 / SPRING 2008  pp. 11 -37.
+Shane,A., Dean,E., Good,N.,King,S.,Naaman,M and Nair,R.,2007. Over-Exposed? Privacy and Considerations in Online and Mobile Photo Sharing . Yahoo! Research Berkeley. San Jose, California,USA. pp. 1-10.
 Tian, Y. and Huang,T., 2010, //Social multimedia computing//, pp. 27-36.
-YouTube available at< http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_what_is> [accessed on 22 March2011]
+YouTube,2011. available at< http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_what_is> [accessed on 22 March 2011]
-YouTube available at <http://www.youtube.com/t/privacy> [accessed on 22 March 2011]
+YouTube,2011. available at <http://www.youtube.com/t/privacy> [accessed on 22 March 2011]
-Zhuhua, L ., Jing, Y ., Chuan, F and Guoqing,Z., 2010, //A tracking model for Enhancing social video integration and sharing//, IEEE computer society, pp. 1571-1576.
+Zhuhua, L ., Jing, Y ., Chuan, F and Guoqing,Z., 2010. //A tracking model for Enhancing social video integration and sharing//, IEEE computer society, pp. 1571-1576.

Sitemap

Differences